Thursday, February 12, 2009

Commercial of Your Nightmares

I've been preparing a post for a while about sexist commercials. This one doesn't fit into that category but it is scary.as.hell.
Do no watch right before going to sleep.

Wednesday, February 11, 2009

Let there be Justice even if the heaven falls!

"Justice is the constant and perpetual will to give each man his due." -Domitius Ulpianus

Justice is very important to me for reasons which I have trouble explaining, not just to others but to myself as well. I know that I have strong feelings about it, and that I have very little hesitation in deciding what I think is "just" or "unjust".
I had learned about Rawls' theories in my ethics class- about justice being fairness- and I am pretty sure that I disagree with just about everything he says.
So, I made this:

I think that it is only reasonable that I explore the concept of justice so that I can better understand and articulate my feelings about it. Also, so I can fight the madness that is justice as fairness.

Maybe some of you are familiar with Karl Marx's quote, "From each according to his ability, to each according to his need." This was actually a statement Marx made in regard to a perfectly communist society, where everyone is producing the maximum that they possibly can. He later refined his statement to, "From each according to his ability, to each according to his contribution," to make up for the fact that, in reality, some people are lazy and don't contribute.

I have a problem with this statement because people ought not have to contribute as much as they are able, but as much as they want to contribute. They should have the freedom to decide whether they wish to only contribute half of their time or ability, or none at all. Also, unlike Rawls (damn you, Rawls!), I think that people ought to be able to pass down and give their money to others; that it is just that they be able to do so if they choose.
That is why I most agree with Nozick's statement "From each according to what he chooses to do, to each according to what he makes for himself, and what others choose to do for him, and choose to give him of what they have been given previously."

I will talk some more about justice a little later on, I am afraid of putting too much in one post and getting bogged down.
But before I go, here's a little sneak peek for you to begin formulating your own thoughts about whether it is merit or desert deserves greater consideration:

Merit: Chelsea merits more praise because she is very intelligent and got a good grade on her exam.
Desert: Savannah deserves more praise because she studied really, really hard for her exam and got a good grade on it.

Thursday, February 5, 2009

But a dandy can never be a vulgar man.

I conversed with someone today who was quite remarkable. She was dressed outlandishly in a tasteless geometric print dress.
She did all the talking and demanded all the attention, and I listened patiently. But when it was my turn to speak I felt like I had to rush, because she wasn't listening or appearing engaged. This made me feel really uneasy. There was none of the usual give and take, the dance that you engage in when in a conversation with someone.
She cleaned her fingernails with the cap of her pen.
She laughed too loudly at her own jokes, and rolled her eyes at my music taste and my opinions that differed from hers.
After 15 minutes I found myself in almost a panic, wanting to get as far away from this person as possible. I cringed every time she opened her mouth, and as soon as I could make a discrete exit, I was out of there.
I realize now that this is person is almost a perfect example of an anti-seductive personality detailed in The Art of Seduction by Robert Greene.

The Vulgarian: Vulgarians are inattentive to the details so important in seduction. You can see this in their personal appearance- their clothes are tasteless by any standard- and in their actions: they do not know that it is sometimes better to control oneself and refuse to give into one's impulses. Vulgarians will blab, saying anything in public. They have no sense of timing and are rarely in harmony with your tastes. Indiscretion is a sure sign of the Vulgarian (talking to others of your affairs, for example); it may seem impulsive, but its real source is their radical selfishness, their inability to see themselves as others see them.

This is a time when it is appropriate to be judgmental. No good can come from associating with a person like this. I know that we have all encountered Vulgarians before. I encourage you to stay as far away from them as possible. More than just avoiding Vulgarians, you should make yourself their opposite- tact, style, and attention to detail are all basic requirements of a seducer.

Monday, February 2, 2009

There's A Tear in my Beer

As a Sociologist, I am very interested in groups. I find it very odd that people act so differently in groups than they do individually. One of these phenomena is a subculture.

A subculture is the culture of groups whose values and norms of behavior are somewhat different from those of the dominant culture.
We are pretty used to encountering subcultures in our day to day lives. My college campus is a subculture, as is a church, a professional association, and a social networking website.
Subcultures get really interesting when they turn crazy stuff that the dominant culture would never stand for into norms.
A few examples that come to mind are cults, sororities, and Mormons.

Cults can convince sane people that it is normal behavior to move to Ghana and kill your baby before killing yourself.
Sororities can convince intelligent, attractive women to degrade themselves publicly in order to join.
Mormons can convince large groups of women that it is normal to be treated as a second class citizen in a house where their husbands have multiple wives.

I read an interesting article today in the academic journal Social Forces (just a sociology journal). It was titled 'The Effect of Country Music on Suicide' by Steven Stack and Jim Gundlach.
These guys did research where they compared the suicide rate in 49 different metropolitan areas with the proportion of radio airtime devoted to country music. They then controlled for poverty, southern locale, divorce, and gun availability (all common predictors of suicide).

They found that there was a very significant correlation between white suicide rates and country music. Metropolitan areas with a high proportion of country music airtime are also high in suicides.

It's not hard to imagine why. The researchers state that three fourths of country songs are about broken hearts, over 50% of the songs are about financial strain, and an incredible number of them represent alcohol abuse as a normal way to deal with your problems.




Here is the interesting part. They aren't claiming that the country music is what causes people to commit suicide, but the country music subculture.
You see, there was no correlation between black suicide and country music.
Black people may listen to country music, but they don't view themselves as part of the country music subculture.

Why would the country music subculture affect rate of suicide, you ask? The researchers say that when a group forms a subculture, the impact of music on mood can be multiplied.
That's right, being a member of a subculture can make music have a bigger impact on your mood. Think of it like being at a concert with a bunch of moshers, or on a dance floor, or your school band playing at a football game. Your participation in all of these subcultures makes you experience the music more than if you were listening to it at home alone.
Because black people don't buy into the country music subculture, they are able to view country music as just music, not a way of life. Country music was found to foster a suicidal mood among people in the subculture, not among the casual listeners.

This article totally creeped me out. I think that from now on I am going to pay much closer attention to my subcultures and what norms they could be indoctrinating me with.

Saturday, January 24, 2009

Liquid Trust

Hey guys,
I know it's been awhile since I updated. I'm just beginning to get back into the swing of things with school. However, I have been conducting an experiment over the last week, performed specifically so that I would have something interesting to write about on my blog.

There is a hormone called Oxytocin. "Recent studies have begun to investigate oxytocin's role in various behaviors, including social recognition, bonding, anxiety, trust, and maternal behaviors."-Wikipedia

Last week, I bought myself a little spray bottle of "Liquid Trust."

"Liquid Trust" is a spray sold by VeroLabs. This is what they promise:

The researchers at Vero Labs have developed a formula that combines the potent human hormone Oxytocin with a odorless atmosphere enhancing spray. It is called Liquid Trust.

Liquid Trust is fragrance free and can be used completely discreetly. The spray has a time release effect to make the effects last for hours after being applied to you. The spray has also been created to provide maximum effectiveness, with no side effects.

Just one or two sprays in the morning after showering, or in the evening before going out, is guaranteed to produce a more trusting atmosphere. This recently discovered innovation can give you an edge that very few people have discovered. The Power of Trust.

I ordered the smallest bottle, since I just planned on conducting a test or two. My guess was that it was a sort of placebo effect. You spray Liquid Trust on yourself and it gives you some confidence, so you act more relaxed and friendly and people respond well. You think that it actually worked, but really it was just your behavior that changed.

The instructions say to use two sprays. I sprayed the top of my head (I'm not sure why I picked that spot) and my wrists. The product claimed to be odorless and I didn't smell anything at all. I then went up to my test subject, Brent. I was very careful not to act overly affectionate or friendly, as I wanted to make sure that it was the product that made the difference.

Nothing happened. I thought perhaps he hadn't smelled me yet. I tried to position my head under his nose. He frowned at me and said, "Get your head out of my face, please." I was disappointed, but pretty sure he had had gotten a good whiff.

He still didn't act any different and the atmosphere wasn't any more "trusting" than usual. I thought that maybe his nose was stuffed up. I went into the hallway and sprayed myself 6 more times, all over. I came back in the room and tried to waft the oxytocin towards him.

Brent said, "Why do you keep going into the hallway? What are you doing over there, moving your arms like that?" He looked at me mistrustfully. This was the opposite of the intended effect! He frowned and then got up and went into the kitchen to make lunch.

Thus ended my Liquid Trust experiment.
Conclusion: It doesn't work at all. In fact, I would like to add that it can make people more distrustful of you... especially if they find out you were trying to mess with their hormone receptors to make them like you. Not cool. (sorry Brent)


Tuesday, January 6, 2009

Resolutions

Sorry it has been so long since I last posted. I was in Germany and on Christmas Vacation and away from my computer much of that time.

It's officially 2009 which means it's time for the obligatory New Year's Resolution post. Up until a few days ago I had all but decided that I wasn't going to have a resolution this year. When it's dark and cold and dreary in January, I feel the least motivated of any time of the whole year. I look outside and think, "Everything's going to hell anyways, screw the resolutions." Also, in Winter you can hide your hideous soul under giant coats, scarves, and mittens. Why aren't there Spring resolutions? Wouldn't it be so much easier to be excited about life in the Spring? Flowers are blooming, it's getting warmer, and the perfect compliment to your Spring wardrobe is a shiny new you.
In the end, I came up with a resolution anyway. I was creating goals for the new semester designed to improve my intellect, and I decided to come up with a goal that would improve my personality as well.
I ran a quick diagnostic on my personality and, to be honest, I was overwhelmed by how overdue on maintenance I was. My check-engine light must have been on for ages. After a more careful analysis of my personality and its strengths and weaknesses I hit upon what I believe to be one of my most major flaws.
Thus, friends and family, you will be relieved to learn that this year I have decided to work on my graciousness. Here is a definition of gracious which explains exactly what I want to strive for: "characterized by charm, good taste, generosity of spirit".
Instead of using anger, I'll use charm. Instead of being demanding, I'll have generosity of spirit. I will still have my values, but I'll exercise them with good taste.
In 2008 my motto was that fantastic line from Veronica Mars,
"You want people to leave you alone or better yet treat you with respect? Demand it; make them." I have yet to find a quote to represent 2009. I'm leaning towards "You'll never be a first class human being or a first class woman until you've learned to have some regard for human frailty" from Philadelphia Story, but I'm not sure it's just right. I'm open to suggestions.

I feel as if I finally have enough self-confidence to begin acting graciously. I never realized how much self confidence it took. This will be an extremely challenging resolution, but I'm up for it. Do you have a resolution? Any advice for how I work on mine? Let me know. Happy New Year.